Skip to content

Extremist Speech and the Internet: The Continuing Importance of Brandenburg

By JUDGE LYNN ADELMAN and JON DIETRICH

In Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, the Supreme Court’s first significant attempt to address the application of the First Amendment to the internet, the Court declined to qualify “the level of First Amendment scrutiny that should be applied to this medium.”  The Court explained that “the vast democratic forums of the Internet” have not “been subject to the type of government supervision and regulation that has attended the broadcast industry,” and “the Internet is not as ‘invasive’ as radio or television.”  Comparing regulation of the internet to a previous congressional attempt to regulate “indecent” commercial telephone messages, the Court noted that an internet user generally must take affirmative steps to receive potentially troubling communications.

Click here to read more.

3 Comments Post a comment
  1. Hi! Would you mind if I share your blog with my facebook group? There’s a lot of people that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Cheers

    February 15, 2011
  2. The creator has published an informative publish. You have produced your degree and there’s not substantially to argue regarding. It can be prefer a universal fact which you can not argue with. Thank you for the facts

    June 1, 2011

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Harvard Law and Policy Review » Volume 4-2

Leave a Reply

You may use basic HTML in your comments. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS