Posted Thursday, January 26th, 2012 by Frank Housh
Agency Nullification at the FEC
In a time of high scrutiny related to the voting franchise, the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the only federal agency authorized to enforce federal campaign finance laws, is so bogged down in political infighting that its authority is at risk of self-nullification. This is of special concern in a presidential election year characterized by concerns over Super PACs, corporate influence over elections in light of Citizens United, aggressive voter identification statutes, and Congressional redistricting.
The FEC’s governing body consists of six (6) Commissioners, three (3) Democrats and three (3) Republicans. As each Commissioner must be nominated by the President and approved by the Senate, the appointments system has bogged down in the same murky quagmire of Senate holds and cloture votes which has dragged the federal judiciary and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau into the depths. Indeed, all but one of the FEC Commissioners is serving beyond his appointed term.
The problem? After the Senator Mitch McConnell (R-IL) secured the appointment of the three Republican Commissioners, campaign finance enforcement actions routinely failed in party-line, deadlocked votes. The problem is well-known in Washington and calls to action have been legion. Yet, little action has been taken on either side of Pennsylvania Avenue, as it seems President Obama doesn’t wish to invest political capital in a fight with Senator McConnell and his colleagues.
To its credit, the House of Representatives House Administration Committee has held hearings and issued subpoenas as part of its policing powers. In the end, only a reconstituted FEC can find its feet and recommence its critical mission. Let’s hope the President takes up the fight with five (5) new nominees.





A few corrections:
(i) Election is singular in FEC
(ii) No nominations are even pending, let alone bogged down in holds and cloture
(iii) House Admin held one hearing, not hearings (that pesky singular/plural issue again)
(iv) No subpoenas were issued
Kendall:
Thanks for reading and your helpful comments. The plural was a typo and I fixed it. I confirmed you are right about no subpeonas issuing. I have adopted the convention of calling all Congressional Committee calls for testimony “Hearings” regardless of how many days of testimony are taken. Sorry for the confusion.
To clarify, my point was not that there were nominations which were bogged down but rather any nominations would doubtless be bogged down in the morass. I urge the President to make the nominations in the last sentence.
Good to know I have intelligent readers out there keeping me honest.